國王的演講英語觀后感

時間：2024-10-31 09:06:10 曉麗英語讀后感我要投稿

相關(guān)推薦

國王的演講英語觀后感

　　在觀賞了后，心中感慨萬千，不禁為作品所深深折服，你有什么總結(jié)呢？觀后感的表達(dá)方式靈活多樣，基本屬于議論范疇，但寫法不同于一般議論文，因?yàn)樗仨毷窃谟^看后的基礎(chǔ)上發(fā)感想。可是觀后感怎么寫才合適呢？下面是小編為大家整理的國王的演講英語觀后感，僅供參考，歡迎大家閱讀。

國王的演講英語觀后感

　　國王的演講英語觀后感 1

　　This is a biopic about how King George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth II, overcame his stuttering problem. Widely considered by all but his father unfit to be king, George is reluctantly thrust unto the throne and into the spotlight after his brother is forced to abdicate. Overshadowed on the global stage by powerful orators like Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini, the King relies on the help of a little-known Australian speech therapist named Lionel Logue to find his voice and courageously lead his people into the most devastating war humanity has ever faced.

　　This is a powerful, hilarious and deeply moving story, told against the backdrop of a critical juncture in modern history, of the emergence of a deep friendship out of a professional relationship between two men who would otherwise never have socially interacted. The screenplay, written by David Seidler (who also wrote Tucker: The Man and his Dream)， is excellent. The dry British wit is hilarious. I was literally slapping my knee during some of the scenes. Tom Hooper (Elizabeth I) does a superb job directing this movie. The buildup to the climactic finale is skillfully executed and prompted the audience to erupt into spontaneous applause. (Apparently, this also happened at the Roy Thomson Hall premiere.) Geoffrey Rush (Elizabeth: The Golden Age) does a fantastic job as Lionel Logue and Colin Firth (A Single Man) is excellent as King George VI.

　　I saw the second public screening of this movie at the Ryerson Theater during the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF).Tom Hooper was present to introduce the movie. He was joined by Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush after the movie ended for a brief Q&A.

　　It turns out that David Seidler also had a stuttering problem as a child and drew inspiration from the kings struggle. Early in his career he wanted to write a screenplay about it. He dutifully asked the Queen Mother for permission. She agreed but told him not in my lifetime. Little did he know she would live to be 101 and he would have to wait another 30 years.

　　Another interesting tidbit we learned was that near the end of the shoot, the crew finally located one of Lionel Logues grandsons, who just so happened to live about 10 minutes away from the director. They got access to Lionels diaries and correspondence and managed to incorporate some of it into the script.

　　This movie is an unqualified must see.

　　【參考譯文】

　　這是一個關(guān)于King George VI的傳記片，Elizabeth II女王的父親，克服了自己的口吃問題。除了他的父親不配做國王廣泛認(rèn)為，喬治是不情愿的推力對王位，在聚光燈下后，他的弟弟是被迫退位。籠罩在全球舞臺上的強(qiáng)大的演說家如Adolph Hitler和本尼托·墨索里尼，國王依靠幫助一個鮮為人知的澳大利亞語言治療師叫Lionel Logue去尋找自己的聲音，勇敢地領(lǐng)導(dǎo)他的人民為人類最具毀滅性的戰(zhàn)爭所面臨的。

　　這是一個強(qiáng)大的，熱鬧的和感人的故事，告訴在現(xiàn)代歷史的一個關(guān)鍵時刻的背景下，出現(xiàn)了深厚的友誼，從兩人之間的專業(yè)關(guān)系，否則從來沒有社會交往的出現(xiàn)。劇本，由David Seidler(誰也寫希爾斯：男人和他的.夢想)，是優(yōu)良的。英國人干得很滑稽。在一些場景中，我簡直就是在拍打膝蓋。湯姆·霍伯(伊麗莎白一世)導(dǎo)演的這部電影也很好。累積到高潮結(jié)局巧妙地執(zhí)行，促使觀眾爆發(fā)自發(fā)的掌聲。(顯然，這也發(fā)生在Roy Thomson Hall首演。)杰弗里·拉什(伊麗莎白：黃金時代)一份很好的工作，Lionel Logue和科林菲爾斯(一個人)是優(yōu)秀的國王George VI.

　　我看到這部電影的第二公開放映在Ryerson劇院在多倫多國際電影節(jié)(TIFF)。湯姆·霍伯介紹電影。他加入了科林菲爾斯和杰弗里·拉什的電影結(jié)束后，一個簡短的問答。

　　原來，David Seidler也有口吃的問題，作為一個孩子，從國王的斗爭中獲得了靈感。在他的職業(yè)生涯早期，他想寫一個關(guān)于它的劇本。他盡職盡責(zé)地請求太后批準(zhǔn)。她同意了，但在我的有生之年告訴他。他不知道她會活到101歲，他還得再等上30年。

　　另一個有趣的花絮我們學(xué)到的是，在拍攝結(jié)束后，劇組終于找到了一個萊昂內(nèi)爾羅格的孫子，他正巧住約10分鐘，離主任。他們查閱了萊昂內(nèi)爾的日記和信件，并設(shè)法將其中的一些內(nèi)容融入劇本中。

　　這部電影是不必看的。

　　國王的演講英語觀后感 2

　　Changjin Lake tells the story of resisting US aggression and aiding Korea. It tells the story of a volunteer company still guarding its position under ice and snow and making great contributions to the Changjin Lake campaign. The whole film is very shocking. Their frozen fragments perfectly show their spirit of returning to death.

　　Not just these people in the ice and snow Changjin lake. In history, China has changed from a country that was slaughtered by others to one of the best in the world. I think the important node of the transformation is a series of battles in which the weak won the strong during World War II. Yes, before that, there were many battles in history, such as the battle of Chibi, which is familiar to everyone. What is the difference between these battles and World War II? As we all know, in the era of World War II, the best weapon for killing people was firearms. Originally, a series of superb strategic commands such as burning, cutting, sword splitting, archery and grass boat borrowing arrows could be used to reverse the war situation. However, during World War II, there was no joint venture to let you burn, bullets could not be reused, and cold weapons gradually withdrew from the stage of history and replaced with guns one by one, Thats a gun. As a long-range weapon, gun also has super power. Whether it has or not often represents the trend of war. But Chinas broadsword team can also defeat Japanese troops with guns.

　　As an article in our Chinese textbook said, "I eat snow here just because the people of our motherland dont eat snow. I squat in the air raid shelter here, and the people of our motherland can not squat in the air raid shelter!"

　　As a minor in the 21st century. I cant imagine their mood, and I should never experience it. This is really a stable day for us brought by them and many of the same people in history.

　　國王的演講英語觀后感 3

　　In Changjin lake, watching the US Air Forces dimensionality reduction attack on North Korea, watching the United States eating meat, vegetables and coffee, and our most lovely people eating teeth cold potatoes and watching the heavy equipment of the US Army, my daughter and I cried because we all understood that this war is a difficult war and a war with huge costs and sacrifices, It is a war based on the flesh and blood of countless ancestors!

　　In Changjin lake, I cried watching American planes shoot our most lovely people. Watching our most lovely people raid the U.S. military in the battle of bombing the signal tower, I also cried. I cried when I saw the final general attack.

　　No matter Chinese or Americans, every soldier is an individual with parents, families and flesh and blood. Originally, our soldiers should go back to their hometown or build a house to support their parents or watch their children to guide their homework and return to ordinary tea, rice, oil and salt. Originally, American soldiers should prepare for Christmas reunion in their hometown.

　　However, the American decision-makers who launched the war sent American soldiers to the Korean battlefield, and we had to be involved in the war to protect our country, smash American ambitions and smash the illusion of Americas future March.

【國王的演講英語觀后感】相關(guān)文章：

《國王的演講》觀后感優(yōu)秀05-30